Hi, 2015-05-08 11:25 GMT+02:00 Kaspar Schleiser <kas...@schleiser.de>:
> Hi, > > On 05/08/15 11:14, Martine Lenders wrote: > > Actually, yes. But I'm still trying to get my head around why netapi (or > > it's wrapper functions [1], slightly renamed) could not be that API. > > Because it requires the use of messages, which implicitly requires using > seperate threads. This is not feasable for low-memory systems. > That's why I've put the emphasis on the wrapper functions of netapi. Cheers, Martine
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
