Hi again ;),
We just opened an Issue [1] "802.15.4(e) MAC-Layer Task Force" where we
can discuss further steps.
Even if this issue might be related to an 802.15.4(e) MAC-Layer, some
parts of that could also be of interest for other (future) MAC-layer.
From our perspective an IEEE 802.15.4(e) MAC layer will be most
beneficial. The most important points would be (i) official
standardization and (ii) interoperatiblity (RIOT <-> other OS).
What would be your opinion on IEEE 802.15.4e. Is the amendment (e) a
straight forward extension to the basic 802.15.4 standard or does this
extention omit the basic mechanisms such as "beacon-mode" and the
"superframe-architecture"?
Does it makes more sense to implement firstly an basic IEEE 802.15.4 and
then the amendment (e) or begin directly with the amendment (e)?
Reference for amendment (e) could be OpenWSN.
[1] - https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/issues/3039
Best
Johann, Jonas
On 20.05.2015 10:28, Hauke Petersen wrote:
Hi,
@Jonas, is your 802.15.4 MAC layer implementation planned to cope with
this?
Cheers,
Hauke
On 19.05.2015 20:18, Kaspar Schleiser wrote:
Hey,
is anybody working on or are there plans for support for discovering
802.15.4 PANs?
Kaspar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
