Hi,
regardless, I opened a PR to fix it:
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/5227

Cheers,
Martine

2016-04-01 13:59 GMT+02:00 Martine Lenders <authmille...@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
> just tested the behavior with `examples/default` and setting the short
> address is working, so it might be a bit messy implemented (mostly because
> `netdev2_ieee802154_set()` was introduced later in the process), but it IS
> working.
>
> Cheers,
> Martine
>
> 2016-04-01 6:55 GMT+02:00 Aaron Sowry <aen...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Actually, I don't think netdev2_ieee802154_set() will ever be called
>> from _set(), since the check to call this is 'if (res == -ENOTSUP)'.
>> 'res' is set to '0' before the case statement and never changed in the
>> case of NETOPT_ADDRESS, so I guess the only reason it works at all is
>> because the device struct's 'short_addr' is being set (incorrectly?)
>> by at86rf2xx_set_addr_short()?
>>
>> /Aaron
>>
>> 2016-04-01 16:27 GMT+13:00 Aaron Sowry <aen...@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm currently working on an 802.15.4 driver, and trying to use all the
>> > fancy new boilerplate functionality which was merged recently. I'm
>> > using the at86rf2xx driver as inspiration, but the way it sets some
>> > options (e.g. the long and short addresses) confuses me a bit.
>> >
>> > The at86rf2xx's netdev set() function, when called with
>> > NETOPT_ADDRESS, will call at86rf2xx_set_addr_short() which sets the
>> > short_addr of the device struct along with some other
>> > at86rf2xx-specific stuff. At the end of the case statement, however,
>> > it then calls netdev2_ieee802154_set() *as well*, which appears to do
>> > the same thing again (minus the chip-specific stuff).
>> >
>> > Perhaps I'm getting lost in a forest of extended structs, but is this
>> > intentional? It seems like at86rf2xx_set_addr_short() should *only* be
>> > doing the chip-specific stuff, and leaving the rest up to
>> > netdev2_ieee802154_set()? I hope my description's not too hard to
>> > follow.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Aaron
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@riot-os.org
>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to