@Peter: Because we should up to date with transceiver driver if we
want RIOT on new product
@Anon: I didn't see that you worked on a specific device, thanks for
considering it. Since you'll have skills and knowledge about CC1200,
it will be easy for you to port CC1350 :-)

2017-01-16 13:58 GMT+01:00 Anon Mall <anon.m...@gt-arc.com>:
> Hi,
>
> @Baptiste: I am currently working with a Remote and a Firefly, so
> implementing the CC1350 won't do me much good for now. But I will
> consider it once I am finished ;-).
>
> @Peter: Okay I will see how far I'll get by extending the CC110X driver
> and will switch to standalone driver if it gets too tedious.
>
> An other question concerning the RIOT SPI implementation. According to
> the CC1101 and CC1200 datasheet, both chips require the chip-select line
> to wait for the MISO line to go low, before switching back to high, when
> a reset command is issued. I tried implementing it by having the driver
> wait for the MISO line after calling spi_transfer_byte(...), but my
> logic analyzer shows, that chip select is set after calling the function
> and before the MISO line is back to low, even though It should be busy
> waiting. I have tried an isolated SPI test, but the symptoms are the
> same. Also when I just stop the code after clearing the chip-select but
> before spi_transfer_byte(...) my logic analyzer shows, that the
> chip-select is not triggered at all. Is there some deeper connection
> between the chip select and the SPI driver I don't know? I believe that
> clearing and setting the chip select would be my responsibility, while
> transferring data over the bus is done by the SPI driver.
>
>
> Hopefully I could explain my problem understandable enough
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anon
>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:55:28 +0100
>> From: Peter Kietzmann <peter.kietzm...@haw-hamburg.de>
>> To: RIOT OS kernel developers <devel@riot-os.org>
>> Subject: Re: [riot-devel] CC1200 Sub-GHz Transceiver
>> Message-ID: <94c91607-4dd7-3e72-7af3-507aee8e3...@haw-hamburg.de>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> @Baptiste: How did the CC1350 get into this round :-)?  Is it similar to
>> the other mentioned radios? In any way, I would be pretty happy to see
>> support for that radio in RIOT. It would enhance the current SensorTag
>> support significantly.
>>
>> @Anon: I have no idea about the differences between CC1101 and CC1200
>> (and CC1350). Whenever possible we try to avoid code duplication so if
>> you think it's easily 'possible' so extend the CC1101 driver, you should
>> go that way. If that means `#ifndef CC1200` in every second code line,
>> you should probably avoid it and write a standalone driver.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 10.01.2017 um 19:14 schrieb Baptiste Clenet:
>>> Anon, you should try to work on CC1350 which is the last one ;-)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> 2017-01-10 11:32 GMT+01:00 Anon Mall <anon.m...@gt-arc.com>:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the reply
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Peter: I will then put it into the driver section, as you have suggested.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Antonio: Thanks for the offer. I will surely take you up on that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also a small question concerning the location of the driver. The CC1200 
>>>> uses
>>>>
>>>> the same command strobes on the SPI like the CC1101. As there is already a
>>>>
>>>> CC110X driver implemented, should the CC1200 be added to that 
>>>> implementation
>>>>
>>>> and transceiver specific code just capsuled as defines or would a 
>>>> standalone
>>>> driver
>>>>
>>>> make more sense?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Anon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Anon!
>>>>> If you need help (as in devices with the CC1200 on board) drop me a line
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> --Antonio
>>>>>> Hi Anon,
>>>>>> it seems no one is working on this driver so please go ahead :-)! As
>>>>>> long as the CC1200 is not part of the CC2538 I agree with you the the
>>>>>> driver should be implemented stand alone. Compare e.g. the at86rf2xx
>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>> Am 21.12.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Anon Mall:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> I wanted to ask if someone is currently working on a driver for the
>>>>>> CC1200 transceiver? Otherwise I would try my luck.
>>>>>>> Also in the readme of the Remote is noted, that the CC1200 is a
>>>>>>> matter
>>>>>> of the CC2538 base. As the transceiver is not included in the CC2538,
>>>>>> I would think that the driver should rather be implemented stand alone
>>>>>> or am I mistaken?
>>>>>>> Cheers and happy Holidays,
>>>>>>> Anon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> devel@riot-os.org
>>>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



-- 
Baptiste
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to