PS: You may want to have a look at this work: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327561337_System_Architecture_Directions_for_Post-SoC32-bit_Networked_Sensors
Cheers Peter On 25/09/2018 23:54, Peter Kietzmann wrote: > Hi guys, > > that sounds awesome! Just some hints inline. > > On 25/09/2018 18:13, Julien Gomez wrote: >> Hello RIOT community ! >> >> We are two students of the Université catholique de Louvain from Belgium >> and we work on our master thesis. The thesis is called "Benchmarking of >> Real-Time Operating Systems for Internet of Things Devices" and is about >> comparing the different implementations of open-source RTOS's currently >> available on the market. >> >> In broad outline, we are planning to analyze the scheduling, switching >> context, memory management and/or any relevant metric dependant of the >> operating system. >> >> Another goal is to compare networking performances or implementations of >> the various stacks available. We have currently no concrete planning for >> this part. >> >> This project will be open source (because we <3 the open source). > > Great, same here :-). > >> >> Here are some questions we have for you: >> - "What would you like to see in this benchmarking project?"; >> - "What RTOS should we benchmark?"; > > Independent from *RT*OS I'd suggest RIOT, contiki-ng, Zephyr, Mynewt. If > you find common ground then FreeRTOS and in case of too much time, add mbed. > >> - "What metric should we consider?". > > Just speaking for the networking part, next to the analysis that you > were pointed to off-list, one might want to see comparable numbers for > the other OSes. Furthermore a more detailed energy analysis is missing. > > Also it would be nice to see how different OSes perform in an "all day" > IoT scenario. For example: x devices in a multi-hop topology communicate > sensor readings each y seconds. What's the energy consumption, what's > the maximum throughput before break-down? And the like ... > > Interoperability, feature sets, and device support are important metrics > next to community agility which is obviously hard to measure but > important when it comes to willingness/speed to migrate bug fixes. > > >> >> We'd love to hear your recommandations or any help you can provide us with. >> >> Also if you are interested about how the project will evolve, we'll be >> glad to update you on our progress. > > I am interested. > > Best > Peter > >> >> If the project gain lot of interests, we will probably create a >> communication channel like Slack or Gitter. >> >> Sincerely, >> Julien Gomez and Trong-Vu Tran >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@riot-os.org >> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > -- Peter Kietzmann Hamburg University of Applied Sciences Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group Berliner Tor 7, 20099 Hamburg, Germany Fon: +49-40-42875-8426 Web: http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
