On 7/10/2014 9:53 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 2014-07-10 16:43, Gabriel Ibarra wrote: >> Hello, I'm working with a board with a few amount of RAM (lpc1768- 32k), I >> recently updated the last version of RTEMS and now I have more overhead, I >> found that the responsible of this new overhead is an object in the bss >> section: "_Configuration_Scheduler_priority_dflt"; So, I want to know what >> is >> that, is there some documentation of it?, Can I disable it? > With respect to this item there is no overhead. Only the memory location > moved > from the workspace to the BSS section. You can configure fewer priority > levels > to save space or use the simple priority scheduler. > Can you see if there are new symbols in the new executable which we might be surprised to see? It is possible a new dependency was accidentally introduced.
Did any existing methods get much larger? Another option is to turn on per function and data sections and see if that helps. The SPARC BSPs did this. It is a little tricky not not a lot to do. Then the linker can drop out unreferenced variables and methods. -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
