It lists an IP address in AU (144.132.189.169) as the one that
spamhaus doesn't like.
http://ipaddress.is/144.132.189.1#.VbDDtPlViko
I am on a corporate guest network in the UK but sent that via OAR.
So I think something at Telstra is at fault this time.
What do you think?
--joel
On 7/23/2015 5:24 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system "corb.contemporary.net.au",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
The administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: On 23/07/2015 5:50 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > + mips tools
do not build > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032 Is this
the same issue ? [...]
Content analysis details: (3.7 points, 2.7 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: gnu.org]
3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[144.132.189.169 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL,
https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
[144.132.189.169 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
