On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > ----- Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> schrieb: >> I don't understand the name "adjust"? I think of adjusting as >> something that would cause a change or modify, which is not the case >> here. I don't have any great replacement, but I guess I might suggest >> "dereference"? > > You may adjust the pointer value, e.g. node + offset. Dereference is wrong, > since you are not supposed to do a *node. Maybe "fixup"? > As I understand it, this callout does not modify the tree or node, so I would avoid using any verb that implies a change happens: fixup implies some modification to me. Perhaps I misunderstood, but the comment says the callout should "get the return value" of a found node. get_value() would be OK except for slight overload with POSIX keys. read()?
I'm not coming up with any great ideas. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
