On 02/05/2016 20:07, Sebastian Huber wrote:
what is the benefit of the Monkey HTTP server compared to Civetweb?
It is not mongoose or civetweb. :) Originally when I started looking at Monkey I was looking for something new to give us options and I still think this is something we should consider. I am happy to see both supported.
It is nicely implemented and there are a couple of people looking after the code base and the related project. I like the idea of a plug in interface which can be statically linked.
We had issues with kqueue in the new stack but I am sure we can find a suitable way to integrate it with RTEMS. I also think we should see if we need the sock pairs to manage events or we could see if we can map at a different layer and use something better suited to RTEMS. The thread stack allocation could be improved, but this is not the first time we have come across issues in this area.
Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
