Hello, I had a problem recently, that the interrupt server (for example used in libbsd) caused some odd behaviour on an ARM Cortex BSP. That was solved by the following patch:
https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=ce3ac00c Just today Sichen Zhao had a similar problem on the BBB: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2017-June/018158.html I took a look and it seems that there are a lot of BSPs which don't check for the valid interrupt vector range in their bsp_interrupt_vector_disable/enable functions. Every one of them will most likely have a problems if someone tries to use libbsd or the interrupt server. It also seems that there is no test for the interrupt server. As far as I know, not all targets are able to support the interrupt server depending on the interrupt controller (I'm not exactly sure which ones have support and which doesn't). So if a test for the server would be added, that test will most likely fail on a lot of targets. Has someone an idea how a test for the interrupt server could look like? We would need an interrupt that can be used on every target. Should we mass-change all BSPs to add the check for a valid interrupt? A mass-change could be problematic because it is nearly impossible to test on all targets and it's in a quite critical location. Kind regards Christian Mauderer -- -------------------------------------------- embedded brains GmbH Christian Mauderer Dornierstr. 4 D-82178 Puchheim Germany email: christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de Phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 18 Fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 PGP: Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
