On 01/02/2018 09:26, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > On 01/02/2018 03:54, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > Perfect timing. Just as the RSB was updated and we have built new > tools. :) > > Hehe > > > > > Should we bump to 8.1? I would think it makes sense if it doesn't break > anything. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Does "not break anything" mean getting test results posted and seeing > there are > no regressions? > > > I wasn't thinking of formal testing. >
We should considering doing this as we have the basic infrastructure, we just need to link it together to make it happen. > > How would we stage this? A way could be adding a recipe to the RSB for > 8.1 and a > manual hack of defaults to build the tools then RTEMS. > > > I honestly have no idea how we would do this with or without the RSB. > We build the tools using the RSB, we build RTEMS and then we run rtems-test on tier 1 BSPs and post the results to bu...@rtems.org? It would be nice to have the process part of the normal work flow, for example we add a new recipe to the RSB, test the tools and then migrate to it if there are no regressions. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
