On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Amaan Cheval <amaan.che...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a ton! I'll likely make the corresponding RSB patch to backport > this to GCC 7.3 tomorrow for Chris to review :) > If need be, we can address pushing it to open gcc branches. I didn't see it as critical as this was a new port but am happy to do it. If it goes on the 7 branch, it needs to go on the 8 branch though. > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:58 AM, Amaan Cheval <amaan.che...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 7:54 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> > I am now confused. Do I need to get a patch into GCC? > >>> > >>> Hey! > >>> > >>> Sorry about the confusion. Technically the answer is yes, but it's > >>> unrelated to _this_ patch. > >>> > >>> To clear things up: > >>> > >>> - [DONE] You already committed a previous patch for GCC for -qrtems, > >>> -qnolinkcmds, etc. > >>> > >>> > >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h= > 602fa1e9d3ea5e87d4d6e17e3e91fc2647e42da3 > >>> > >>> - [DONE] This email thread backports the above patch to > >>> rtems-source-builder so that we can use it in GCC 7.3. Chris accepted > >>> this > >>> patch into rtems-source-builder here > >>> > >>> > >>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/commit/?id= > defa958301215995b0fa41d8e65cb23c9a28a847 > >>> > >>> - [PENDING - Joel] I recently made a GCC patch to have GCC build crti.o > >>> and > >>> crtn.o for the x86-64 RTEMS tools, so we can have symbols like "_fini" > >>> added automatically through our bsp_specs file, the way we do for other > >>> architectures. As Sebastian mentioned in an email to you and me, I > >>> believe > >>> he'd prefer if you reviewed the patch here: > >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg00126.html > >>> > >>> - [PENDING - Amaan, and later Chris] Once the crti.o patch above is > >>> merged > >>> into GCC, I'll make a corresponding backport patch to > >>> rtems-source-builder > >>> to make that available to GCC 7.3 as well, and then Chris can review + > >>> merge that in after. > >>> > >> I meant to deal with this today. > >> > >> I am leaving myself a note to get this merged next week. Ping me in the > >> middle > >> of next week if you haven't heard action. > > > > > > This is now committed on the gcc master. > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2018-05/msg00226.html > > > > Hopefully that helps clean up the RSB. > > > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Hope that clears things up! > >> > >> > >> It does. > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, May 3, 2018, 8:38 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> >> On 07/04/2018 08:35, Amaan Cheval wrote: > >>> >> > Adds -qnolinkcmds, -qrtems, and defaults to pass to linker, for > >>> >> > gcc targeting x86_64. > >>> > >>> >> Pushed, thank you. > >>> > >>> >> Chris > >>> >> _______________________________________________ > >>> >> devel mailing list > >>> >> devel@rtems.org > >>> >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > devel mailing list > >>> > devel@rtems.org > >>> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >> > >> > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel