On Thu, May 24, 2018, 4:18 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 25/5/18 1:05 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:> Worst case, I could add code to > the > target specific code to recognize the > > previous instruction and get the size. Hmm.. should be a return variant. > Let me > > think on that. Can't be that many instructions that make sense as the > last one > > it a method. > > Would a function with a no return attribute have that sort of instruction > sequence? >
Probably not but we have so few of those it wouldn't add many more instructions. I will play with this. > > Chris >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
