On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 6:13 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 24/8/18 4:32 am, Mikhail Svetkin wrote: > > Yes, I use the legacy network stack (I did not know it is legacy, Do you > have > > any plans to remove it from source?). > > There are no concrete plans however Joel and I have discussed moving the > legacy > stack to a separate repo to provide long term support. We understand we > have > slow moving users. >
Agreed. > > We also understand the complexity separate repos brings to our users and > to the > development of RTEMS. I think our ecosystem will need to address this after > RTEMS 5 is released. > Even beginning to discuss that the old stack should not be used with new architectures is a difficult discussion. But the x86_64 and RISC-V don't make sense to use with it. So drawing a circle around what should continue to work and what should be discouraged is important. This is one of the main points of maintaining open source. We don't have a master list of paying users to base decisions on and need users to be open so we can plan correctly. I may have missed the beginning of this thread. What architecture and bsp are you using? --joel > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
