On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 1:25 PM Christian Mauderer <l...@c-mauderer.de> wrote:
> Am 31.03.19 um 09:08 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 7:27 AM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org > > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > > > On 31/3/19 5:05 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:09 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>> wrote: > > > > > > Remember you can submit your "Final" proposal many times on > > GSoC site. > > > I made a few comments just regarding the 'public' view of your > > > project. I think the technical plan looks reasonable, and > > leave it to > > > the potential mentors to steer your technical path. > > > > > > Gedare > > > > > > Thank you for reviewing the proposal. I have made the changes > > according to the > > > comments and also have uploaded the final proposal in the summer > > of code site. > > > > How will this be tested? > > > > The target is to get a console on display. To test each step, I was > > planning to write some > > tests like to test the EDID reading, we can write a test that returns > > the EDID reading if the > > display is detected, or an error if it's not there. > > I think this point is very important and not very clear to me yet. Do > > you have any suggestions > > on testing each part of the project and if possible, include them in the > > testsuite? > > > > Is https://github.com/littlevgl/lvgl of any value? > > > > I had a brief look and this looks really great and can be a nice > > addition to RTEMS. > > I think this will go in the "future improvements" (?) > > > > Chris > > > > > > I would suggest a framebuffer console as the primary target for this > project. Maybe as an extended goal it could be nice to try the libraries > already in RSB: > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/tree/rtems/config/graphics > > Adding a new library would be a very extended goal in my view because it > hast the potential to eat up a lot of time. > > Vijay: I think you most likely need some test application already during > phase 2? So maybe you should add a point that you want to at least start > a fb-console there? Alternatively: Some simple test application that > just draws some dots or lines? > > In phase 3 it would be great to have the graphics libraries as extended > goal (lower priority than cleanup and getting code merged). > > Hi, Thanks for the notes. I have added a point about writing a test application in phase 2 and also mentioned the intention to use the RSB graphics library to get a GUI after the code gets merged. > > Regards > > Christian >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel