>
> On Sep 25, 2019, at 07:50 , dufa...@hda.com wrote:
>
> Yes, I did. Below is the configuration, it is very similar to some of the
> ones in the tests. I added the RTEMS_TEST_INITIAL_EXTENSION in order to get
> rtems_tester_printf() to work.
>
>
(...)
I broke the console output in July when I got the BSP to build for the head
with "libbsd" but only recently got back to actually using this work, then I
was focused on getting everything building for that target. See the email
"build of libbsd for powerpc fails with error:redefinition of 'eieio'". Back
then I moved definitions out of <bsp.h> and into <libcpu/io.h>, but I failed to
put <libcpu/io.h> in the shared console, thinking code would fail to compile if
they referenced the definitions.
That PowerPC shared console has the following "iffy" code with
BSP_UART_IOBASE_COM1 no longer defined. In console initialization it skips
over that port when it sees the ISR entry point set to 0.
I'll have to revisit everything affected by that change to look for similar
"#ifdef" logic.
{ "/dev/ttyS0",
#ifdef BSP_UART_IOBASE_COM1 <<< *No longer defined*.
BSP_uart_termios_isr_com1
#else
0
#endif
},
Peter
-----------------
Peter Dufault
HD Associates, Inc. Software and System Engineering
This email is delivered through the public internet using protocols subject to
interception and tampering.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
