On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 7:32 AM Sebastian Huber < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > some specification items may contain copyrightable information. Doorstop > removes all comments from YAML files. Other than "it just does it", is there any explanation for this? It seems heavy-handed and arbitrary. > So, my proposal is to add two > attributes to every specification item: > > 1. > > license: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause OR CC-BY-SA-4.0' > > This allows the use of content from specification items as source code > and documentation input. > > 2. > > copyrights: > - 'Copyright (C) 2019 John Doe' > I think I am OK with this as long as we only accept requirements with a single license type. We just need to pick a license. If we go to BSD-2-Clause, then we don't have to give credit in generated documents. For CC-BY-SA, I believe any generated document would have to give credit to every entity with a copyright listed. If everyone agrees that is the primary practical difference between the two licenses, I would prefer we require all to be BSD-2-Clause. But I am happy with the license and copyright being attributes that are generally treated as comments. --joel > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : [email protected] > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
