On 17/3/20 4:50 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17/03/2020 03:09, Chris Johns wrote: > >>> That follows the rtems/waf (new build system) convention by default. >> Do you mean the work Sebastian is doing? If you are, it currently might but >> that >> work is not finished and it may change, partially to make it consistent with >> this package. This has not been discussed. > > We discussed the way to find tools during the waf configure phase. See bottom > of > this email: > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2019-December/056291.html >
Oh we did, I am sorry. > Maybe I misinterpreted your steps 1. to 3. I am not sure if you have, I have not tested it. > In the waf configure output you see > the absolute paths of the tools. So you can check if they are the right ones. The way rtems_waf works is due to the paths passed to the tool check? My reading of Hesham's change is only the env path is checked for clang and this is what I am questioning, i.e. does the --prefix, --rtems-tools etc work with clang just like gcc? I think we should be consistent what ever the specifics are and this should before across different packages and for tools within a package. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
