Thank you. That makes sense. I will prepare a new version.
Von: Sebastian Huber [mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 20. März 2020 12:54 An: Sommer, Jan; devel@rtems.org Betreff: Re: AW: [PATCH v2 3/3] i386: Port to RTEMS On 10/03/2020 09:12, jan.som...@dlr.de<mailto:jan.som...@dlr.de> wrote: [...] diff --git a/freebsd/sys/net/iflib.c b/freebsd/sys/net/iflib.c index 89bc5e79..09282ac7 100644 --- a/freebsd/sys/net/iflib.c +++ b/freebsd/sys/net/iflib.c @@ -1031,8 +1031,13 @@ iflib_netmap_txsync(struct netmap_kring *kring, int flags) } if (!(ctx->ifc_flags & IFC_NETMAP_TX_IRQ)) if (kring->nr_hwtail != nm_prev(kring->nr_hwcur, lim)) { +#ifndef __rtems__ callout_reset_on(&txq->ift_timer, hz < 2000 ? 1 : hz / 1000, iflib_timer, txq, txq->ift_timer.c_cpu); +#else /* __rtems__ */ + callout_reset_curcpu(&txq->ift_timer, hz < 2000 ? 1 : hz / 1000, + iflib_timer, txq); I am not completely sure about all the side effects of replacing callout_reset_on with callout_reset_curcpu, but the struct callout has no "c_cpu" member in RTEMS. If someone has a better idea, please tell me. I would change the callout_reset_on() macro and don't change the caller. #ifndef __rtems__ #define callout_reset_on(c, to_ticks, fn, arg, cpu) \ callout_reset_sbt_on((c), tick_sbt * (to_ticks), 0, (fn), (arg), \ (cpu), C_HARDCLOCK) #else /* __rtems__ */ #define callout_reset_on(c, to_ticks, fn, arg, cpu) \ callout_reset_sbt_on((c), tick_sbt * (to_ticks), 0, (fn), (arg), \ -1, C_HARDCLOCK) #endif /* __rtems__ */
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
