On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 3:59 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 12:21 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> I liked it better before, when the test prints nothing if it is >> successful. I think this is the trend we are heading toward in rtems >> tests. >> > I will incorporate more changes to the test so there is minimal printing if > the test is successful > The test is originally written by @Vaibhav Gupta > it would require to do minor changes in the previous parts of the test as well > should i do that ?? Yes that would be good.
>> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:46 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > I ran the code using qemu for risc-v architecture. >> > The value of r = 0 for the function to run without error >> > while the error is raised when the value is not matched with the correct >> > value defined in >> > rtems_test_assert(). >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > devel mailing list >> > devel@rtems.org >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel