On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 8:56 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > On 03/04/2020 16:51, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > Thanks for this, please push it > Sorry, it was not meant to push. It doesn't fix the problem. The libbsd > build still fails.
But fewer of the tests? I guess if the default configuration is best for applications, then fine. Maybe this needs to be documented in the relevant BSP docs section for atsam? Considering the SDRAM limitations it is not possible to compile libbsd for this configuration of the board. Can/should we provide a different linkage for building/testing libbsd or, since there are still failures, consider it a loss? I haven't been tracking the libbsd discussion entirely, but do/can we provide expected-failures for libbsd tests? Gedare _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
