On 14/04/2020 09:02, Chris Johns wrote:
On 14/4/20 4:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Close #3944.
---
rtems/config/rtems-bsp.cfg | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/rtems-bsp.cfg b/rtems/config/rtems-bsp.cfg
index d50615e..91296b1 100644
--- a/rtems/config/rtems-bsp.cfg
+++ b/rtems/config/rtems-bsp.cfg
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
# The linker flags need to include the machine options for the BSP.
#
%define mflags_filter awk '{for (i=1;i<NF;++i) if ($i ~ /\-m/)
printf("%s ",$i);}'
-%define rtems_bsp_ldflags %{rtems_bsp_ldflags} $(echo
"%{rtems_bsp_cflags}" | %{mflags_filter})
+%define rtems_bsp_ldflags %{rtems_bsp_ldflags} $(echo
"%{rtems_bsp_cflags}" | %{mflags_filter}) -Wl,--gc-sections
What about adding a define like ..
%define rtems_bsp_ldflags_extra -Wl,--gc-sections
.. or something like that and then adding it to rtems_bsp_ldflags?
It would make it easier to track.
Could you please change the patch and push it. In RTEMS 6, we should
replace this flag tinkering.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
