Hi, I am really excited to annonunce the pre-release verion of Strong APA Scheduer for RTEMS that we've been working so hard for!
The documentation for the scheduler is now live at : https://richidubey.github.io/Strong-APA-Documentation/html/ To understand how the code works, please go through these links (in order): Documentation for Struct defined for various uses <https://richidubey.github.io/Strong-APA-Documentation/html/structScheduler__strong__APA__Struct.html> Changes for Enqueue <https://rtemswithrichi.wordpress.com/scheduler-strong-apa-changes-scheduler_smp_enqueue/> Changes for Get_highest_ready <https://rtemswithrichi.wordpress.com/scheduler-strong-apa-changes-get_highest_ready/> Improvements over v1 <https://github.com/richidubey/rtems/blob/9bb37330e2c91a2fbd5bf3236770acb06d3466b3/cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulersmpimpl.h#L1093> (after last <https://github.com/richidubey/rtems/pull/4> review): - Better coding style and variable naming - Better documentation - Successfully runs the Strong APA test <https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-August/061474.html> Plans for v2: - Use chain of scheduled nodes present in SMP Context rather than per cpu variables based on this <https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-August/061520.html> discussion - Work on the reviews I would request you to provide your reviews on whether the variables names that I chose makes sense (like the array Struct) and if my code follows the coding conventions. Also, please let me know if there's anything that's still looks wrong in the code. Please use this <https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-August/061559.html> patch or this <https://github.com/richidubey/rtems/pull/7> pull request to checkout my changes. Thanks, Richi.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
