Chris, hm, isn't this something related to our tiering of architectures/BSPs? Those who have a maintainer/test board should detect any fault due to the proposed change rather soon/at the next regular test. Those who are not in constant testing... well they are not tier 1, right?
wkr, Thomas. Am 20.10.20 um 04:32 schrieb Chris Johns: > If these architectures are not being maintained as you suggest where do we > document this and how do we inform the users? > > If you did update the architectures to remove set_vector are they now > maintained? > > Is updating the code without being able to test the changes maintaining an > architecture or BSP or do we require some level of testing? > -- -------------------------------------------- embedded brains GmbH Thomas Doerfler Dornierstr. 4 D-82178 Puchheim Germany email: thomas.doerf...@embedded-brains.de Phone: +49-89-18 94 741-12 Fax: +49-89-18 94 741-09 PGP: Public key available on request. For our privacy statement, see https://embedded-brains.de/en/data-privacy-statement/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
