Hi Sebastian, I'd prefer 2.
The directive may be called from an interrupt context (substituting "must", "must not", as appropriate) Regards, Andrew > On 22 Jan 2021, at 12:09, Sebastian Huber > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > since there is an agreement to add a CONSTRAINTS section to the directive > documentation, I need some standard phrases. > > 1. > > The directive may be called in interrupt context. > > 2. > > The directive may be called from interrupt context. > > 3. > > The directive can be called ... interrupt context. > > What do you prefer? > > I would use it for other contexts as well. > > -- > embedded brains GmbH > Herr Sebastian HUBER > Dornierstr. 4 > 82178 Puchheim > Germany > email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16 > fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht München > Registernummer: HRB 157899 > Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler > Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier: > https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/ > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew Butterfield Tel: +353-1-896-2517 Fax: +353-1-677-2204 Lero@TCD, Head of Software Foundations & Verification Research Group School of Computer Science and Statistics, Room G.39, O'Reilly Institute, Trinity College, University of Dublin http://www.scss.tcd.ie/Andrew.Butterfield/ --------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
