Should we add a macro for this, e.g., "RTEMS_CASE_NO_BREAK" so that we can update them in future if needed for other tools?
Regardless of the addition of a macro these are fine, the grlib one came through separately I think. But I'd like to see a macro proposed. On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 2:26 PM Ryan Long <thisisryanl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > To fix these Coverity issues, I just needed to add a comment to tell > Coverity to ignore the error. I did this using the same method as shown > in this article > https://www.synopsys.com/blogs/software-security/gimme-a-break/. > > Thanks, > Ryan > > Ryan Long (3): > grtc.c: Fix four Missing break in switch Coverity errors > cpuusagetop.c: Fix three Missing break in switch Coverity errors > pci_cfg_read.c: Fix Missing break in switch (CID #1399723) > > bsps/shared/grlib/tmtc/grtc.c | 4 ++++ > cpukit/libmisc/cpuuse/cpuusagetop.c | 3 +++ > cpukit/libpci/pci_cfg_read.c | 1 + > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+) > > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel