On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:56 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> Should we set the cstd version at the top-level? > That's not what was done for C++ when I looked for examples. I suppose this lets the C++ version vary by tool or library. And we did import some third-party code. --joel > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 3:16 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > > CentOS 7 has gcc 4.8 which defaults to C90 and this results in warnings > > for code that is valid C99 but not C90. > > --- > > misc/wscript | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/misc/wscript b/misc/wscript > > index 521eddf..21e7f75 100644 > > --- a/misc/wscript > > +++ b/misc/wscript > > @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ def build(bld): > > # > > conf['warningflags'] = ['-Wall', '-Wextra', '-pedantic'] > > conf['optflags'] = bld.env.C_OPTS > > - conf['cflags'] = ['-pipe', '-g'] + conf['optflags'] > > + cstd = '-std=c99' > > + conf['cflags'] = [cstd] + ['-pipe', '-g'] + conf['optflags'] > > conf['linkflags'] = ['-g'] > > > > # > > -- > > 1.8.3.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel