Just formatting, but Sebastian works in this area right now, so maybe he can pluck it or ACK a push is ok.
I noticed it while reviewing his doc generation patches. On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 9:12 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > If that's just a formatting error fix, looks good. Push it. > > If it's more, poke me. > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 10:10 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> --- >> c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst >> b/c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst >> index 9ca7dff..c81af4e 100644 >> --- a/c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst >> +++ b/c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst >> @@ -112,7 +112,9 @@ less than its period. For example, a periodic task's >> requirements may state >> that it should execute for 10 milliseconds every 100 milliseconds. Although >> the execution time may be the average, worst, or best case, the worst-case >> execution time is more appropriate for use when analyzing system behavior >> under >> -transient overload conditions... index:: aperiodic task, definition >> +transient overload conditions. >> + >> +.. index:: aperiodic task, definition >> >> In contrast, an aperiodic task executes at irregular intervals and has only >> a >> soft deadline. In other words, the deadlines for aperiodic tasks are not >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@rtems.org >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
