On 15/06/2021 07:50, Chris Johns wrote:
On 15/6/21 3:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 15/06/2021 06:03, Chris Johns wrote:
On 8/6/21 10:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/06/2021 14:08, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Is the kernel rsb recipe fixed yet? That was a blocker.
Is this really a blocker? Can't this be done on demand when someone wants to
update them?
This depends on our shared view of supporting an eco-system.

Support was added before we moved the build system to waf to build the kernel as
part of a vertical software stack and this I consider important.
I didn't say the contrary. What I don't agree with is the work package ordering
and dependency chain. The time I wasted on keeping the build system zombie more
or less alive I could have spent on updating the RSB.
No doubt. I am responding to your comment that this task can get done on demand.
How does the ecosystem view of this fit into your "demand" driven view?

On demand means if someone wants update the RSB, the files are converted to the new build system. The files using the old build system still work since they use commits which have the old build system included. At least this is how I think the RSB works.

--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to