On Sat, Jul 24, 2021, 11:30 AM Christian Mauderer <o...@c-mauderer.de> wrote:
> Hello Joel, > > On 24/07/2021 18:18, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021, 10:19 AM Christian Mauderer <o...@c-mauderer.de > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > in a discussion with Husni I noted that the patches adding ttcp are > > only > > on the 6-freebsd-12 branch of libbsd. Is there a reason that they are > > not on master too? > > > > > > Yes but forgetting isn't a good reason. I know I have a recent patch so > > apps using C99 or C++03 can compile using libbsd missing also. I will > > survey OAR and make sure we catch up. > > I missed something like that in the past too and I will miss it in the > future. And I'm sure that I have some on master that are not on > 6-freebsd-12. So no problem. Just wanted to check that there is no other > reason. > We probably need to collectively be more diligent about asking that any patches go onto 6-freedbsd-12 and master. Some also should go to 5-freebsd-12. We are all busy and just forget. > > By the way: Please tell me if you find patches that I missed ;-) > I would if we can figure.out how to spot them. > > > > > Is there any reason rtemsbsd/ just shouldn't be the same? > > > > Most of it most likely is the same. But there are differences. Some of > them might shouldn't be there but they are there. Try to checkout master > and do a > > git diff 6-freebsd-12 -- rtemsbsd/ > > I don't think that someone wants to clean that up on an update. > Is it possible to take the output of that and do a git blame on the 6-freebsd-12 branch, grab the hash and author, and generate a master list of hashes and who was responsible for review? It would make the audit easier. Changes to the FreeBSD directory might be harder. I know Kinsey back ported some stuff. --joel > > Best regards > > Christian > > > > > > > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=af06b267c5ce04e8a4a7719cb0c723ee4a27f4b4 > > < > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=af06b267c5ce04e8a4a7719cb0c723ee4a27f4b4 > > > > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=7960ab7a43d5a7c6ceccdd67f8e379adfce7a633 > > < > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=7960ab7a43d5a7c6ceccdd67f8e379adfce7a633 > > > > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=6cc63cbe657c3ee664727cce1a54acc7e7b5fe9d > > < > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=6cc63cbe657c3ee664727cce1a54acc7e7b5fe9d > > > > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=8dfea31d729fafab69b5cf1846598f5104b0faeb > > < > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?h=6-freebsd-12&id=8dfea31d729fafab69b5cf1846598f5104b0faeb > > > > > > Background for the question: I expect that an update to FreeBSD 13 > will > > use only what is on the master branch. That's basically what master > is > > for: Tracking the development to keep up with new stuff in FreeBSD > and > > make it easy to jump to the next FreeBSD release. In other words: I > > think a (possible future) 6-freebsd-13 branch will be based on master > > and not on 6-freebsd-12. Am I wrong with that assumption? > > > > Again: please correct me if I'm wrong but with that in mind I would > say > > that it is a good idea to port to master and 6-freebsd-12 or (for > > experimental stuff) only to master. But not only to 6-freebsd-12. > > > > Best regards > > > > Christian > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
