From: Konstantin Belousov <k...@freebsd.org>
to warm timecounters.
It seems that second call does not add any useful state change for all
implemented timecounters.
Discussed with: bde
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 3 weeks
---
cpukit/score/src/kern_tc.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/kern_tc.c b/cpukit/score/src/kern_tc.c
index 16fbb9ba70..39e67ede19 100644
--- a/cpukit/score/src/kern_tc.c
+++ b/cpukit/score/src/kern_tc.c
@@ -1393,7 +1393,6 @@ tc_init(struct timecounter *tc)
return;
#ifndef __rtems__
(void)tc->tc_get_timecount(tc);
- (void)tc->tc_get_timecount(tc);
#endif /* __rtems__ */
timecounter = tc;
#ifdef __rtems__
@@ -1709,7 +1708,6 @@ sysctl_kern_timecounter_hardware(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
/* Warm up new timecounter. */
(void)newtc->tc_get_timecount(newtc);
- (void)newtc->tc_get_timecount(newtc);
timecounter = newtc;
@@ -2264,7 +2262,6 @@ inittimecounter(void *dummy)
/* warm up new timecounter (again) and get rolling. */
(void)timecounter->tc_get_timecount(timecounter);
- (void)timecounter->tc_get_timecount(timecounter);
mtx_lock_spin(&tc_setclock_mtx);
tc_windup(NULL);
mtx_unlock_spin(&tc_setclock_mtx);
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
