On 29/11/21 11:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 24/11/2021 10:57, gabriel.moy...@dlr.de wrote: >>>>>>> I am fine with this change being pushed to the 5 branch but I think it >>>>>>> needs to built with the tier 1 archs (i386, powerpc, arm). >>>>>> I could compile them for the BSPs of those archs. >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>>> Does it make sense to run some test in qemu? >>>>> Test results are always welcome. >>>>> >>>> I've run the following tests: >>>> - sptimecounter02, 03 and 04 are pass on pc686 and Xilinx_zynq_a9. >>>> - sptimecounter01 doesn't print something since everything happens inside >>>> of >>>> boot_card(). How the result of this test is verified? >>> Re-run the test using rtems-test. >>> - sptimecounter01, 02, 03 and 04 are marked as pass on Xilinx_zynq_a9 and >>> psim >>> - sptimecounter02, 03 and 04 are marked as pass on pc686 >>> - sptimecounter01 is marked as invalid on pc686. This result is with and >>> without the patch set. I guess it is because nothing is printed >>> out. >>> >>>> Are there any other tests that can be interested to run? >>> If there isn't any other test to run, I would say that the patch set is >>> ready. >> After running the whole testsuite for pc686, xilinx_zynq_a9 and psim; there >> are no new failures introduced. > > For me this is fine, what do you think Chris?
Sorry about the delay and being distracted .. a few deadlines. Yes this looks fine. I think Jan has commit access so if he could push this to the 5 branch it would be appreciated. Thanks Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel