Has this patch been tested with ILP32? I suspect that this line might need to get yanked out to a shared lp64 linkcmds.base and a shared ilp32 linkcmds.base or this line pulled up into the bsp-specific linkcmds variants.

Kinsey

On 7/22/2022 01:35, chr...@rtems.org wrote:
From: Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org>

Update #4684
---
  bsps/aarch64/shared/start/linkcmds.base | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/bsps/aarch64/shared/start/linkcmds.base 
b/bsps/aarch64/shared/start/linkcmds.base
index bcdf4715d7..f4639bd990 100644
--- a/bsps/aarch64/shared/start/linkcmds.base
+++ b/bsps/aarch64/shared/start/linkcmds.base
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ bsp_stack_hyp_size = DEFINED (bsp_stack_hyp_size) ? 
bsp_stack_hyp_size : 0;
  bsp_stack_hyp_size = ALIGN (bsp_stack_hyp_size, bsp_stack_align);
MEMORY {
-       UNEXPECTED_SECTIONS : ORIGIN = 0xffffffff, LENGTH = 0
+       UNEXPECTED_SECTIONS : ORIGIN = 0xffffffffffffffff, LENGTH = 0
  }
SECTIONS {
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to