On 9/3/2023 7:22 am, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 3:47 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org
> <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote:
>     On 9/3/2023 5:40 am, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>     > Casting the node returned by rtems_chain_head is incorrect. That node is
>     > owned by the control structure and use of it post-cast could cause
>     > memory corruption.
>     > ---
>     >  c-user/chains.rst | 4 ++++
>     >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>     >
>     > diff --git a/c-user/chains.rst b/c-user/chains.rst
>     > index f518ef4..e791d10 100644
>     > --- a/c-user/chains.rst
>     > +++ b/c-user/chains.rst
>     > @@ -193,6 +193,10 @@ placed on another chain:
>     >          rtems_chain_initialize_empty (out);
>     > 
>     >          node = rtems_chain_head (chain);
>     > +
>     > +        /* The node returned by rtems_chain_head() is owned by the 
> chain */
>     > +        node = node->next;
> 
>      node = rtems_chain_next (node);  ?
> 
> node->next is used slightly further down in the example, but I can change it 
> to
> rtems_chain_next for both if you prefer. 

Thanks. I think making all references use the API in the example is a good 
thing.

Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to