On 12/9/2023 4:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 12.09.23 08:40, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 12/9/2023 4:31 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 27.07.23 13:33, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> Prepare for RTEMS 6.1 release. >>>> >>>> Update #4921. >>> How do we want to proceed with the tools for the RTEMS 6.1 release? >> I need to move 6 to tar files but other tickets have taken what time I had. > > The patch uses a tar file for GCC.
Oh sorry then I am fine. > I guess for Newlib we have to host an archive. I am more relaxed about newlib because it's release cycle is difficult to line up for us at a functional level. Long term the key things for gcc is being to raise bug reports knowing the exact tarfile we have used. >> >>> Is GCC 13.2 still the desired GCC release? >> What is the alternative? > > Do we need one? GCC 13.2 is the best option from my point of view right now. > Sorry I was wondering if you have something else in mind. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel