Hi, > OK. Maybe then it would be good to make some notes in which cases it's > OK to add another flag to avoid that someone adds a lot of hardware > dependent flags here.
Yes, we will add the description. Thanks. > I assume if something is really very special to a specific hardware, > the driver should get an extra driver specific IOCTL for that, right? Yes, this is already implemented, although not used for CTU CAN FD at the moment. IOCTL calls not recognized by common layer in can-bus.c are passed to the driver (if driver implements this functionality, otherwise -EINVAL is returned immediately). So it is possible for driver to have specific IOCTL calls. Best regards, Michal _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
