Considering we are developing both l4 variants and riscv cores, I would
agree with Joel's recommendations. Start with sel4 and move to fiasco later
if needed.
On Mar 13, 2015 3:32 PM, "Joel Nider" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Hesham,
>
> I would strongly consider seL4 over Fiasco for a few reasons:
> 1) Fiasco is written in C++ and I found it quit a challenge to read
> through due to overloaded functions - the control flow jumps between files
> a lot, and its not always clear which object you have during a static
> analysis. seL4 on the other hand, is pretty much straight C, and fairly
> well commented. 2) The code size (as Gernot mentioned) is much smaller in
> seL4, which makes it easier to comprehend in a short amount of time
>
> But I suppose it really depends on what you intend to do with the kernel
> in the end. If the verification & proofs are important to you, then the
> choice is easy. If functionality and features are important, Fiasco
> probably has the advantage. If you want simple code that a student can read
> and do something useful with in a short time, my vote is for seL4.
> Regards,
> Joel
>
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:38:35 +0000, Hesham ALMatary <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>>
>> I'm Hesham ALMatary a computer science research student at the
>> University of York. I am considering porting L4 microkernel variants
>> to RISC-V [2] (for both my research and Google Summer of Code), and
>> Fiasco.OC is one of these variants, but I want to extend the options
>> here by asking about seL4.
>> Is this project would be: first applicable, and second of interest to
>> you? And if yes, would you offer some help (guidance)? I am sending
>> this message as suggested here [1] that I should contact you if I'm
>> willing to port seL4 to a new platform.
>> [1] http://sel4.systems/GettingStarted/
>> [2] http://riscv.org/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -- Hesham
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to