It should have gotten a little better with the introduction of incremental retype, but probably hasn’t changed significantly.
Cheers, Gerwin On 26 Oct 2016, at 16:51, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Right. I don't think we have measured the performance recently so I cannot comment off the top of my head, but at the same time I cannot think of a reason for why it would have changed. Adrian On Wed 26-Oct-2016 3:46 PM, Jeff Waugh wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:37 PM, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The difference is that recycle does not require you to keep around (or be given) the untyped in order to then be able to perform the retype. Recycle is also a single syscall, and thus has better performance, than revoke + retype. Oh yes, sorry, I know the difference in behaviour -- is the difference in performance in today's seL4 similar to what was outlined in the paper? I had it on my list of things to pay attention to based on those results. Thanks, Jeff _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
