There needs to be a named maxim, like Murphy's Law, for the omission of a "not" from a sentence that emphatically needs it. The more significant the claim, the more likely the omission will happen.
Some sort of cousin to Edgar Allan Poe's "Imp of the Perverse", maybe. At 2020-01-23T19:56:48+1100, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > Fortunately, since the AOS course builds _on top of_ instead of altering > the seL4 kernel, this does create a GNU GPL section 7 problem[3]. Correction: this does NOT create a GNU GPL section 7 problem. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@sel4.systems https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel
