Hi Lance,
Lance Fredrickson wrote,

> 
> 
> On 11/2/2016 12:05 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> >Hi Lance,
> >Lance Fredrickson wrote,
> >
> >>It seems as if static libc is missing symbols for libdl in uclibc-ng 1.0.19.
> >>When trying to static link I get the typical 'undefined to dl....' errors,
> >>but dynamic linking is successful.
> >But isn't that what is expected. From my understanding, you can't
> >use dl* functions if you are using a fully static linked binary.
> >
> >Are you trying a mixed situation? Supporting both modes?
> >
> >Can you add some ore details to your use case. Thanks
> >  Waldemar
> 
> Maybe if this were the glibc mailing list you could expect that. One of the
> things uclibc (and musl) toughts over glibc is that you can create fully
> static binaries, this has always been the case for as far as I've know
> uclibc, so I am very perplexed by your response.  This has only become an
> issue in the latest release.  All the other libraries functionality have
> been place into libc itself, ie libm, libpthread, librt, libdl.  Now that
> this has been done, you shouldn't ever have missing symbols from any of
> these libraries, be it dynamic or static. Why wouldn't you be able to static
> link with dl* functions? I've been doing it for years. Is this not a major
> reason people would use uclibc other than for size as well? For it's static
> linking capabilities?  uclibc allows this, where in glibc static linking is
> discouraged, and most often not even possible if your application has need
> for dns lookups.

I think you overreact here somehow.
I just have not concluded what exactly the problem in 1.0.19 is for
you. I am willing to get back the functionality you need.
I just have not understand it. So an example is always useful to get
me understand your problem.
 
> My environment provides all dynamic and static libraries, and the user is
> left up to either dynamically linking or statically linking, though it is
> most often used for static linking.  Many many applications use dl*
> functions, so I assure you I've been static compiling them long before
> uclibc forked to uclibc-ng.

best regards
 Waldemar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@uclibc-ng.org
http://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to