All,
On 2017-03-20 21:34 +0100, Yann E. MORIN spake thusly:
> On 2017-03-20 20:51 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> > On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:21:45 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > > What do you think about following patch?
> > > We had some discussion about this recently on the buildroot
> > > mailinglist. Any other use cases other than rpcbind/nfs-utils you
> > > can think of?
> > I had a quick look in Buildroot to see which packages currently only
> > work with "native RPC" (i.e provided by the C library) and not with
> > libtirpc.
[--SNIP--]
> > - samba4, depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_NATIVE_RPC only
>
> Given the size of the package, I doubt having it depends on glibc would
> be too bad.
>
> And when glibc actually drops their internal rpc, then samba will have
> to add suopport for an alternative implementation.
I had a quick look at bLFS again, and they recommend building against
libtirpc:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/basicnet/samba.html
So we may in the end be also able to switch entirely to using libtirpc.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
