Hi, Anthony G. Basile wrote, > On 4/29/18 8:49 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > @Waldemar, the issue is not anything you suggested in your previous > > email. What might you have touched in ld64-uClibc.so or libc.so itself > > that would affect the search path? If its any help, I hit the dlclose() > > issue many years ago (and might have been the first to report it, I'm > > not sure). There was some size issue wrt 64 vs 32 that cause an issue > > there. I wonder if in fixing that maybe you broke LDPATH? > > > I need to add to this. The problem was introduced after 1.0.26 but > before 1.0.28. Again, any clues as to which commits to look at? 1.0.27 > fails to build on Gentoo amd64, so that's the best I could do with > tagged releases.
Could you rebuild 1.0.26 with USE debug so that SUPPORT_LD_DEBUG is enabled. And then post the output of LD_DEBUG=all ./test And then the same with 1.0.30? I haven't used ldconfig/ld.so.cache on my systems before starting with Gentoo, so may be there something is broken or a regression. best regards Waldemar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@uclibc-ng.org https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
