Owen Taylor writes: > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Isn't the number of patches where you don't want: > > - An explanation of what is wrong > - A bug number to be ability to refer to the change later > - The ability to add further comments to the bug report > if more information is needed >
Yes, these were the features that conviced me of the bugzilla. > > We have some patches in the bugzilla.gnome.org to allow it, but: > > - Patching bugzilla extensively degrades your ability > to upgrade to newer versions, so take the advice of experience, > try to avoid it. Yes, that's true. On the other hand I've seen quite a few bugzillas that have been heavily tweaked. There seems to be a great demand to get away from the spartanic looking default face and also there seems to be demand for functionalities that the default face doesn't offer. > > - Bugzilla really doesn't want to send mail to people without > accounts; so, if you get a bug submitted by a non-account-holder > it's sort of "second class" > > Something more sophisticated (email creation of accounts, etc) > is certainly theortically possible, but I don't know of an > implementation. > Account creation by bugzilla may not be all that importand. However creating and commenting on a bug may be more interesting. Egbert. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
