Mark Vojkovich wrote:

On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, etienne deleflie wrote:



Mark Vojkovich wrote:



On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, etienne deleflie wrote:





Hello,

I'm attacking the bottle necks in my app........ and I've just noticed that XvShmPutImage is one of my bottlenecks. It takes 4 msecs to draw 1 512 x 256 sized frame.




What do you get for:

x11perf -repeat 1 -shmput500

 If run in depth 24, the fps is roughly the bandwidth, in MB/sec
to the framebuffer.



I get

x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40100001 on :0.0
from sine
Sun Jun  8 14:34:04 2003

Sync time adjustment is 0.0489 msecs.

360 reps @ 16.0078 msec ( 62.5/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square




Something is wrong with your system.


can I know on what figures and logic you draw this conclusion ? ... are those figures too slow ?

What does "cat /proc/mtrr" say?

no such file or directory. I'm on debian.

  And were there any warnings in the /var/log/XFree86.0.log (lines
that start "(WW)")?

(WW) Cannot open APM
...
(WW) Warning, couldn't open module xv
(II) UnloadModule: "xv"
(EE) Failed to load module "xv" (module does not exist, 0)
...
(WW) System lacks support for changing MTRRs
(--) NVIDIA(0): VideoRAM: 65536 kBytes
(II) NVIDIA(0): Using ConnectedMonitor string "CRT,CRT"
(WW) NVIDIA(0): Inappropriate ConnectedMonitor string.
(WW) NVIDIA(0): Unable to use ConnectedMonitor string.
...
(WW) NVIDIA(0): Failure reading EDID parameters for display device 0.
(II) NVIDIA(0): External: Using hsync range of 31.50-90.00 kHz
(II) NVIDIA(0): External: Using vrefresh value of 60.00 Hz
(II) NVIDIA(0): Clock range:  12.00 to 350.00 MHz


And this was a laptop right?


yep, dell inspiron 8200

Are you perhaps stuck in some
power saving mode?

dont think so, power saving has been turned off.........well, I have disabled APM.

Mark.

etienne

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to