On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Warren Turkal wrote: > This patch makes the radeon driver treat ia64 as a non-legacy architecture.
> This patch by Alex Williamson. > "xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/Imakefile assumes ia64 > should behave the same as i386 and allows random probing or I/O > port space. In moving away from the legacy model, I believe we > should change this to set ATIAvoidCPIO to YES. Systems that do > no provide a legacy I/O port range may otherwise machine check." > --- xc-old/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/Imakefile 2003-07-25 > 06:04:31.000000000 -0500 > +++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/Imakefile 2003-08-07 > 04:35:24.000000000 -0500 > @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ > * ATIAvoidNonPCI necessarily implies ATIAvoidCPIO. > */ > #if defined(i386Architecture) || \ > - defined(ia64Architecture) || \ > defined(AMD64Architecture) || \ > defined(AlphaArchitecture) > # ifndef ATIAvoidCPIO Also rejected. Alex's assertion no longer holds now that all the major Itanium chipsets are properly supported. Besides, ATIAvoidCPIO (and ATIAvoidNonPCI) are merely stopgaps which I intend to deprecate. You seem to be "submitting" a string of old patches, some of them twice. Why? The proper patch submission mechanism is patch@, or bugs.xfree86.org. Marc. +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Marc Aurele La France | work: 1-780-492-9310 | | Computing and Network Services | fax: 1-780-492-1729 | | 352 General Services Building | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | University of Alberta +-----------------------------------+ | Edmonton, Alberta | | | T6G 2H1 | Standard disclaimers apply | | CANADA | | +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ XFree86 Core Team member. ATI driver and X server internals. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
