Aidan Kehoe writes: > Ar an 13� l� de m� 8, scr�obh Egbert Eich : > > > Bug #72 has not been committed as it is not yet clear what your final > > conclusions are. > > Perhaps a comment to that effect could have been added to the bug? Anyway, > as I said, I don't have the free time any more. If anyone else wants to take > that on, go for it, but if not, close it. >
That's bad. Perhaps the last comment in Bug #72 was a little bit misleading for you, but the fact that you posted two diffs and it was not clear which one would be the one to use and the fact that you didn't look into the problem of overspecified dependencies made it look to me that there is still stuff to come. Besides to get the dependencies right one does not need an in depth knowldege of the imake process as this is pretty close to what will appear later on in the Makefile. Too bad that you don't have time to look into this any more as nobody else seems to do either. So maybe we have to wait until someone else comes along to look into the parallel make problems. Egbert. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
