Kean Johnston wrote (in a message from Sunday 21)
> > I think you're right here. Since we can't assume that every platform
> > on which XFree86 is built has C99 types and that there's no previous
> > art of using uint32_t instead of the older u_int32_t in the XFree86
> > tree, the SCO diff should be reverted and changed to something that
> > will define u_int32_t on SCO if needed.
> I can do that but there's not much prior art of using u_int32_t either.
> In fact, just one file: loader/xf86sym.c, and a few header files, most
> of which seem BSD related. And equally small number use uint32_t. I
> didnt run into problems before your checking at revision 3.18. Perhaps
> the best way to avoid this is to use neither ... simply use unsigned int?
We settled down for using CARD32 for now.
Matthieu
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
