On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:39:07AM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > > > If you read the notice that accompanied the change you are refering to, > you will see that this change of yours is unnecessary.
I'm not sure why you feel it's unnecessary since I never declared my motivation for the change. I use tools (external to the xfree project) to process these cpp scripts. I admit, until recently I only used them on xf4.3 and earlier but this one script stands out from the others because of the XCOMM not starting at col 0. I only made the change request because it doesn't seem consistent with the rest of the scripts in the tree. Of course you're free to reject the request. > Furthermore, it is incomplete as there are three other occurrences of > XCOMM preceded by whitespace. > Your correct, I only noticed this after I posted the patch/request. Let me know. -- Tyler R. Retzlaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.NetBSD.org _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
