> >New patch (attached) is more correct and should not harm something.
> 
> Looks OK to me.  Is it needed for the second XkbAdjustGroup() call too?

Yes.

I did'n forget but tried to imagine when a negative value can appear there.
(The bug reason is that the 'state' structure there keeps all fields as
an unsigned char but actually some of them sometime represent negative values.)
But after some thinking I suppose there are such cases.

-- 
 Ivan U. Pascal         |   e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Administrator of     |   Tomsk State University
     University Network |       Tomsk, Russia
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to