On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:19:33PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >David Dawes dixit: > >>Another useful data point might be a delay loop in place of the usleep(). > >I was going to try that today, replacing the call usleep in the .s >file with a simple delay loop, but checked first if it still failed >without, and it worked without the usleep workaround. > >What did I change? I lowered the default cflags from -march=pentium >to -march=i486 (to fix another miscompile in ppp(8)) and rebuilt the >whole system (just playing with cflags in X had not helped earlier). > >I'm surprised, but thankfully it "looks like" a gcc optimisation bug. >Thanks for the help, though.
That's interesting. >Sad: now 108.000 fps instead of 115.200 fps :( > > >By the way, you wanted to provisionally commit my decompress.c, >I hope you didn't forget? I didn't forget. I'll commit it soon. David _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
